#Troubleshooting Case# How We Identified High Storage Latency Before It Became a Major Outage
  

rizzuan Lv1Posted 2026-Jul-14 12:20

One of the biggest challenges in a virtualized environment is that performance issues are not always caused by CPU or memory utilization. Sometimes, the actual bottleneck is hidden in the storage layer.

Recently, I came across a situation in which several users reported that their applications were slow to respond. At first glance, nothing seemed unusual.

1. Initial Symptoms
1) Applications were loading much slower than usual.
2) Some users experienced intermittent timeouts.
3) Virtual machines remained online, but response times were inconsistent.
4) CPU and memory utilization across the cluster appeared normal.

Since compute resources looked healthy, we decided to investigate the storage layer.

2. Investigation Process

The first step was to review storage performance metrics.

We monitored:
  • Storage latency
  • IOPS
  • Read and write throughput
  • Storage utilization
  • Backup job schedules



During the investigation, we noticed that storage latency increased significantly during business hours, especially when scheduled backup jobs were running.

This caused multiple virtual machines to compete for storage resources, resulting in slower application performance.


3. Root Cause

The issue was not caused by hardware failure.
Instead, it was a combination of:
  • Heavy backup workloads run during peak business hours.
  • Multiple high-I/O virtual machines share the same storage resources.
  • Lack of workload optimization across the cluster.




4. Resolution
To reduce storage contention, we implemented several improvements:

  • Rescheduled backup jobs to run outside business hours.
  • Redistributed high-I/O virtual machines across the cluster.
  • Reviewed storage performance regularly.
  • Configured alerts for abnormal latency spikes.



After these changes, storage latency returned to normal, application response times improved, and users no longer reported intermittent slowdowns.

5. Lessons Learned

This experience reminded me that performance troubleshooting should never focus only on CPU and memory.

1) Storage latency is often the hidden factor behind many virtualization performance issues.

2) By monitoring storage health proactively and planning backup schedules carefully, administrators can prevent many performance problems before users are affected.

Has anyone experienced similar storage latency issues in their HCI environment? What was the root cause, and how did you resolve it? I'd be interested to learn from your experience.

Like this topic? Like it or reward the author.

Creating a topic earns you 5 coins. A featured or excellent topic earns you more coins. What is Coin?

Enter your mobile phone number and company name for better service. Go

Humayun Ahmed Lv4Posted 2026-Jul-14 12:53
  
Excellent real-world case study. Consider adding sample latency thresholds (e.g., <5 ms normal, >20 ms critical) and screenshots of monitoring graphs to make it even more practical.
Sangfor Jojo Lv5Posted 2026-Jul-15 09:41
  
Congratulations! We’re excited to let you know that your case has been adopted by the Sangfor Community! As a token of our appreciation, we’ll be sending 3,500 coins to your account. Feel free to check your balance! Thank you so much for sharing your real case with us – it really means a lot!
Prosi Lv3Posted 2026-Jul-15 11:12
  
Storage performance (in Sangfor HCI hyperconverged infrastructure) directly impacts every workload running on the cluster. Proactively monitoring this metric can help identify potential issues before they impact end users.